<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fueling the Business &#187; FAS 141(R)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fuelingthebusiness.com/tag/fas-141r/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fuelingthebusiness.com</link>
	<description>a blog for Texas oil and gas producers and service providers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:16:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Business Combinations&#8230; Just Add Them Together, Right?</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelingthebusiness.com/2008/12/16/business-combinationsjust-add-them-together-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fuelingthebusiness.com/2008/12/16/business-combinationsjust-add-them-together-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Simpson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accounting Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controller's Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business combinations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAS 141(R)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FASB Statement 141(R)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelingthebusiness.com/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) revised the business combination rules effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2008.  For calendar year entities, any purchase transaction in 2009 will be accounted for under FASB Statement 141(R). Under current practice, business combinations are accounted for under a cost-accumulation approach, which focuses on the costs paid to acquire the business.  The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a title="SFAS 141R- FASB" href="http://www.fasb.org/st/summary/stsum141r.shtml" target="_blank">Financial Accounting Standards Board </a>(FASB) revised the business combination rules effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2008.  For calendar year entities, any purchase transaction in 2009 will be accounted for under <a title="SFAS 141R" href="http://www.fasb.org/st/summary/stsum141r.shtml">FASB Statement 141(R)</a>.</p>
<p>Under current practice, business combinations are accounted for under a cost-accumulation approach, which focuses on the costs paid to acquire the business.  The new standard uses a fair value approach based on marketplace information and exit prices to value assets and liabilities of the acquired business.  In addition, the new standard revises the guidance on accounting for contingencies, restructuring costs, and transaction costs among others.</p>
<p>The new method of recognition could lead to very different results in reporting business combinations:</p>
<ul>
<li>actual gain might be recorded on purchase</li>
<li>subsequent adjustments due to changes in fair value flow through the income statement</li>
<li>recognition of goodwill attributable to the noncontrolling interest</li>
<li>retroactive recording of adjustments made during the measurement period to the transaction date</li>
</ul>
<p>If you have questions on a transaction, let us know.  How will the new rules change the way you consider business combinations?  Give us your thoughts in a comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fuelingthebusiness.com/2008/12/16/business-combinationsjust-add-them-together-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

