<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fueling the Business &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fuelingthebusiness.com/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fuelingthebusiness.com</link>
	<description>a blog for Texas oil and gas producers and service providers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:16:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Full Cost Vs. Successful Efforts</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelingthebusiness.com/2009/01/07/full-cost-vs-successful-efforts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fuelingthebusiness.com/2009/01/07/full-cost-vs-successful-efforts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accounting Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controller's Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[full cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[successful efforts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelingthebusiness.com/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We got the following question from one of our clients: &#8220;Is there any benefit to switching from full cost to successful efforts?&#8221; Under successful efforts accounting, a company only capitalizes exploration, acquisition, and development costs that directly result in proved reserves. Exploration costs and costs of unsuccessful projects are expensed as incurred. Full Cost accounting requires [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We got the following question from one of our clients: &#8220;Is there any benefit to switching from full cost to successful efforts?&#8221;</p>
<p>Under successful efforts accounting, a company only capitalizes exploration, acquisition, and development costs that directly result in proved reserves. Exploration costs and costs of unsuccessful projects are expensed as incurred.</p>
<p>Full Cost accounting requires a company to capitalize all costs related to the exploration, acquisition, and development of oil and gas reserves. The full cost method allows a company to capitalize these expenditures into a cost center and amortize those costs as the reserves are produced. A &#8220;ceiling&#8221; is established for these costs centers to ensure that these costs are recoverable through production. Because the primary component of the ceiling calculation is discounted future net revenues at year-end prices, impairment expenses will increase as oil and gas prices decrease.</p>
<p>Full cost accounting results in much larger cost centers, therefore DD&amp;A and impairment expenses will be greater than for companies that utilize the successful efforts method. However, successful efforts companies will record significant exploration expenses as these costs are incurred.</p>
<p>Changing from one method to another would be a change in accounting principle and require a restatement of the prior year financial statements, which becomes more and more difficult the longer a company has owned its properties.  A conversion would require a substantial amount of resources, especially from full cost to successful efforts because of the detail involved. A change of this type should be carefully considered in light of the facts and circumstances specific to your company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fuelingthebusiness.com/2009/01/07/full-cost-vs-successful-efforts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

